Articles:

The Building Research Establishment (BRE), dealing with the quality and assurance aspects..

When asked why, the client might typically respond, ‘When working with water you always do that’.The answer would likely again be, ‘Well, because that’s what the book says’.

repeatedly moves the conversation and enables both parties to imagine other scenarios; not burying the facility underground and instead building it above ground, for instance.This persistent question-asking can unlock the project, opening it up to a previously unthought of solution.Stripping away previous knowledge, questioning potentially inefficient systems and modalities, is what is needed to allow these kinds of conversations to take place..

This is the challenge to traditional design processes, which can be quite turgid and passive: a brief is stated and a firm contends with whether they can deliver the predefined needs of the client.Interrogating the brief is not part of the process.. Elevating and liberating the brief into a problem statement is an essential part of the work and the design process of Design to Value.

Collaborating to establish a set of working methods, goals and value drivers creates clarity of purpose from the start.

It creates opportunity.. To purchase this book, visit., Asia-Pacific Lead at Bryden Wood, talks to.The problem which loomed behind the stated barriers is that continuing with the historical mode of investment will simply not deliver the stated intent and aspirations of the industry and society at large..

So, where do we go next?.The conversation has just started, however there are some clear ways forward: -.

Non-competitive sharing between companies enables a combined building of knowledge and confidence about the developing state-of-the-art platform.In fact, this is not a paradigm shift in technology but a shift in perception..